In 2014 i used to be interviewed for the freelance on Sunday a couple of paper I printed on women’s experiences of discrimination in academe. The interview, i used to be suggested, would be another glorious dimension to my ‘impact case study’. Here was AN example of ‘public engagement’ and therefore the quite issue that the analysis Excellence Framework (REF) agenda is seeking to foster.
Shortly then interview I received AN email telling Pine Tree State that I had been awarded ‘whiny feminist of the month’. the person World Health Organization had sent this email blind traced in a number of my senior male colleagues. His email and in public accessible blogpost were clearly designed to mortify and probably silence Pine Tree State. (Although i used to be confident i used to be in glorious company: Harriet Harman, Laura Bates, Jo Swinson, King of England Criado Perez have conjointly been ‘recipients’).
Reflecting on this expertise junction rectifier to a discussion on whether or not this grooved ‘impact’ in respect to the wants of the official. The institutional response was no. that successively got Pine Tree State pondering what it’s that counts as impact. Is it solely one thing that ends up in positive change? And what concerning the negative consequences of participating in impact and public engagement strategies? Do these not ‘count’, particularly knowing girls square measure additional possible to be subject to on-line abuse?
These queries junction rectifier Pine Tree State to accept the extent to that the official Impact policy itself is set during a gendered context. we all know that ladies square measure under-represented within the academy, with fewer than twenty five of out of over nineteen,000 professors square measure BAME girls. girls square measure additional possible to be negatively evaluated by students; whereas at identical time be expected to produce bigger levels of pastoral care. girls square measure additional possible to own their work devalued; be under-represented at conferences; and fewer possible to be cited.
A key part of feminist theorizing is drawing on the lived experiences of girls to reveal the ways in which within which power structures work. then in my recent paper, I John Drew on educational women’s experiences to know whether or not, and if so, how, public engagement and therefore the impact agenda square measure gendered.